The version shipping on Friday will not only be a release build, but it will have the benefit of fixes and optimizations from the event itself. I would not be the least bit surprised to learn they accidentally introduced a performance regression as well. I half suspect they even rolled the dice on some last minute tweaks for this audience, which clearly came back to bite them with that pause bug. The pause bug that all the streamers got tells me this was a very raw build that the devs felt comfortable letting the streamers use because they'd literally be in the room together and because they knew the exact hardware the streamers would be using. This event wasn't just a preview of the game, it was a golden QA opportunity to let real and experienced users do unexpected things in the game. Why use a debug build for this event? Because they wanted the logging. You can see in the main menu that it's a debug build, so some amount of compiler optimization was left on the table. That said, I think the devs got a bad draw on this build. They all had reservations, some more severe than others: Manley made the fair point that from a features standpoint, KSP1 is currently much better value for your money, Dodd expressed concern over the steep requirements, and SWDennis confirmed that the build he played is definitely laggy. Hell, they all had to be peeled away from the computers when their three hours were up. I watched every video beginning to end and not one of them thought it was a disaster. However, you seem like you're actually worried and not just here to stir the pot, so here's my attempt to assuage your concerns.īottom line, I don't think the game is in nearly as rough shape as this subreddit seems to think it is. Keep being the great community you are.Īlso don't forget the letter from the KSP 2 Creative Director: Īt the risk of being accused of huffing copium here in the designated complaining thread, this just seems incredibly unlikely to me. Violations of rule 1 will result in a ban at least until after release.Įdit about 14 hours in: No bans so far from comments in this post, a few comments removed for just crossing the civility line. " Avoid ad-hominem where you address the person making the point instead of the point discussed (such as "You would understand if you. Focus on using "I" statements, like "I think the game. The game (should)/(should not) be better developed by now (heat effects, science mode, optimization, etc). The low FPS demonstrated on some videos (is)/(is not) acceptable I (think)/(don't think) the price is justified at this point I (think)/(don't think) the game will be better optimized in a reasonable time. I (think)/(don't think) the roadmap is promising System requirements are (reasonable)/(unreasonable) I (like)/(don't like) the game in its current state Use this thread for the following related (and often repeated) topics: Let's condense into a thread to consolidate ideas and ensure you can express or support your viewpoints in a meaningful way (besides yelling into the void). There are myriad posts and discussions generally along the same related topics. Send us a message with proof, and we'll give you some flair to show it! Disable header animation Enable header animation Δ | Support/bug reports | KerbalAcademy | ConsoleKSP Last contest's winner: forteefly1998! Have you developed a mod? See this page for more infoĬommunity Teamspeak Server Refrain from submitting images that involve real life space disasters that resulted in loss of lifeĭon't post/discuss mirrors or torrents of any version of KSP See the discussion on misc posts for more info No posts unrelated to KSP or memes and image macros. Please remain kind and civil at all times
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |